First copy costs of scientific articles – a short overview

While I was working on a longer text, I gathered – more or less as a by-product – information from studies and reports on the (first copy) costs of a scientific article. As a result, it can only be noted that the information available on these costs (and related costs as margins) are very different and really difficult to compare. The latter confirms my impression that there is a huge lack of transparency in the scientific publications market. The following table may give some insight in the information I found. It is also available via GitHub (, so please feel free to improve/ update the data or add new information.nn


 nnSourceRINn2008 nnBritish Academyn2007nn  nnDubinin2012nn  nnWalthamn2010nn  Shiebern2012 Houghton et al.n2010 Van Noordenn2013
First copy costs of an article, including profit margins nn1.127 £ nnPNAS: 3.700 $nnNature: 30.000 – 40.000 $
First copy costs of an article, without profit margins1.136 £ nn420 – 650 $ nn10 $
First copy costs, including profit margins per page nn360 $ –
Margin nn18%Closed Access on average 20-30%,nn nnOpen Access (commercial) on average 15%
Cost of peer review (not included in first copy costs):1.194 £900 £ –
Methodsanalysis of literature and reportsexpert discussionempirical studyempirical studycase studyanalysis of literature and reportsanalysis of literature and reports, interviews
DisciplinesmixedSocial Sciences & HumanitiesmixedSocial Sciences & HumanitiesMachine Learningmixedmixed

nn nnSources:nnBritish Academy for the Humanities and Social Sciences. (2007). Peer Review : the challenges for the humanities and social sciences. A British Academy Report. Retrieved from, P. (2012). PEER Economics : the effect of large scale deposit on scholarly research publishing. Retrieved from, J. W., Rasmussen, B., & Sheehan, P. (2010). Economic and Social Returns on Investment in Open Archiving Publicly Funded Research Outputs. Melbourne. Retrieved from Information Network. (2008). Activities, costs and funding flows in the scholarly communications system (p. 88). Retrieved from, S. (2012). An efficient journal. The Occasional Pamphlet. Retrieved June 05, 2012, from Noorden, R. (2013). Open access: The true cost of science publishing. Nature, 495(7442), 426–429. doi:10.1038/495426annWaltham, M. (2010). Humanities and social science journals: a pilot study of eight US associations. Learned Publishing, 23(2), 136–143. doi:10.1087/20100209nn nn nn 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *